Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Acquittal

 Well looks like the charge against me by Rock Island County on the complaints made by John Hager. Are as follows,  acquittal. Aka,(NOT GUILTY) Even though Rock Island county searched my home illegally.  Arrested me illegally. Rock Island County Sheriff's Deputy lied to  a Judge3x on affidavits to get search warrants.  That is a felony.   Well this is gonna be huge in the lawsuit. ;)  and every officer that was here that day will be a part of my lawsuit. EVERYONE. They had to spend 1000,s of dollars on this case. All the man hours.  The time. For a bogus charge.  I live in mercer county.  I blog in Mercer county. They had no jurisdiction and they know it. And even tho I will not reveal there name. Someone from there department let me know that they were really looking good for Guns or Ammo to revoke my probation . DIDN'T HAPPEN DID IT? They will spend thousands  of taxpayers dollars on a misdemenor charge but John Hager can fracture his child's head in 2 places. Lie to the same investigator, Mindy Myers 3x. And he gets off on court supervision.  ( I shall be posting all of the documents from his case in near future so you readers can see). WELL ROCK ISLAND COUNTY BULLIES THIS IS NOT OVER. You wanted this fight  I didn't but since you brought it to my  door so be it.

5 comments:

  1. Congrats to you Mr. Goosens. I had no doubt you would be acquitted given the flip flopping of the State..First arguing to a Judge that you committed misconduct in office (even though they acknowledged you were not a cop), then before the trial Judge arguing that you couldn't have committed misconduct because you were not a cop. Also the jurisdictional issues that would have been a problem for the State if they actually wanted to go to an open Court and humiliate themselves. Sounds like absolute Persecution and Malice - not good faith. Also sounds like a violation of your 4th and 1st Amendment rights - as they first searched your house under false pretenses and then they came after you for a BLOG. Looks like a Judge saw through the deception. NOTICE - Mr. Goosens how quiet the State kept this. Why because they knew it was a leaky bag of feces. If it was worth prosecuting they would have dragged your rear end all over the media. They kept quiet because its a tacit admission of wrong doing in my humble opinion. NOW - drop a lawsuit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Congratulation Mr. Goosens. I find it troubling that when the State brings a case against you they parade your case through the media, except for this case. Why didn't they do that here - most likely because they know they were wrong. The searched your house using the basis of "misconduct" knowing that you weren't a police officer, then they plead before the trial judge and admit that you weren't a police officer. So they Judge shopped and lied to search your residence. That goes against attorney ethics and itself is misconduct and I would report them not only to the State Agency who oversees them - but to a Federal Agency. They falsely pleaded before a Judge in order to search your residence. They violated your 4th Amendment to Unreasonable Search and Seizure - as their own Court papers before the trial Judge contradict their Search Warrant Affidavit. That's NOT GOOD FAITH - and they should be held personally responsible as well as criminally responsible. In addition it appears that the Judge ruled in your favor, which only proves that they went after you for your BLOG - which violates the 1st Amendment. I believe the Supreme Court has recently argued that blogs have 1st Amendment Protections. This no doubt was a violation of your 1st Amendment. I hope you sue each and every one of them not only in their official capacity - but individually and personally. I bet the State didn't want this to go to trial because of the MANY issues that would have come to light. Like JURISDICTION. They aren't into prosecuting you - they want to persecute you. That's my humble opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fractured a baby's skull?!?! Shame on anyone involved in this witch hunt. Was it a certain board member talking a certain sheriff to do something? Or a proven liar in the ISP office? Perhaps a vengeful asst. states attorney? Did Mcgehee approve this? If so, he should be removed and charged with malicious prosecution. I'd sure like to know who all was behind this, as I know of a couple bullies in both the states office and sheriffs. Hope all of the truth comes out. State sure looks malicious and incompetent w this ruling. But how does someone almost kill a child and get off? SMH

    ReplyDelete
  4. Next up this cop will win his appeal in the case where Ryan Tone, Scott Gardner and others lied through their teeth. He should be given back pay and his position back.

    ReplyDelete
  5. McGehee asks Madigan to take alleged corruption case


    Posted Online: July 29, 2014, 10:21 am
    Comment on this story | Print this story | Email this story
    By Eric Timmons, etimmons@qconline.com
    ROCK ISLAND -- Rock Island County State's Attorney John McGehee wants Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan to investigate alleged corruption by county officials.

    Mr. McGehee had asked the Illinois State Police to review allegations contained in whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former county employee. He now has kicked the investigation up to Ms. Madigan's office and specifically the AG's Public Integrity Unit.

    The whistleblower lawsuit was brought against the county and county board chairman Phil Banaszek by Meg Hoskins, who was fired as the county's human resources director last August.

    Ms. Hoskins believes she was fired in retaliation for her refusal to establish what her suit calls an "illegal pension scheme" at the county.

    The scheme involved improperly reporting hours worked by a small group of county board members who participate in the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund.

    County board executive assistant Shelly Chapman directed Ms. Hoskins to use hours worked by the group for the Rock Island County Forest Preserve to count toward the 1,000 hours on county business they must complete to qualify for pension contributions, according to the suit..

    Ms. Hoskins was told by the IMRF that forest preserve hours could not be used to meet the 1,000 hour standard for county work as it''s a separate entity and that such a scheme would be illegal.

    Ms. Chapman, "told Ms. Hoskins to follow her instructions anyway and to hope that IMRF would not notice the discrepancy," according to the lawsuit.

    Early last month, Mr. McGehee asked the state police to review the case to see if it merited a criminal investigation.

    Officers from an outside state police district conducted interviews, including with the IMRF and handed the results of their investigation to Mr. McGehee last Friday.

    Speaking in Rock Island early Tuesday, Mr. McGehee said he was now referring the case to Ms. Madigan's office, which he added was the "prudent and proper thing to do."

    He told reporters he could not release any details about what state police found that led him to make the decision to move the case to Ms. Madigan's office.

    **RICO SAO is a joke. The ARE the corrupt ones. What a joke. 2nd most corrupt county in the state. Actually, per capita, probably #1.

    ReplyDelete